Speaker summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos115.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin D. Williamson results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Genetic Fallacy, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 46.9% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 348.913 faulty-reasoning hits from 115.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 32.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (13,982 of 28,364 speakers). This Kevin D. Williamson is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Kevin D. Williamson
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510050.7% percentile
32.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos115.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 43.2%43.2%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 34.7%34.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 46.9%46.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 34.7%34.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 46.9%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 43.2%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos