Speaker summary
ā 42%1 analyzed article/video116.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Curtis results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 271 faulty-reasoning hits from 116.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.3% and a BS Rank of ā 31% (18,450 of 26,505 speakers). This Kevin Curtis is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Kevin Curtis
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 116.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510030.4% percentile
19.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos116.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 32.9%32.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.1%28.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 11.3%11.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos