At Kansas City housing complex, formerly homeless veterans find dignity and community 22%

By Brandon Azim0%

7/1/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 682 faulty-reasoning hits from 503 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.1% and a BS Rank of 22% (15,926 of 20,368 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the article peer group.

On a hot Tuesday morning, Army veteran Kevin Curtis gives tours inside a finished housing unit known as Valor House to curious guests. 
All in their own way are supporters of the United States military who say they want what's best for veterans, and this goes double when it comes to affordable housing. 
Curtis, who moved into the complex in February, was in transitional housing for about three months, and it didn’t feel like a home to him. 
“I mean, they say that's your house, but to me it was everybody's,” Curtis said. 
“Ever since I came and got here, I've been living in my own place, and I enjoy it, I really do, and it's quiet.” 
Curtis is a military man through and through, and he said he loves to be in communities with people who have also served. 
He said some people have similar experiences and stories, and no subject is taboo at Valor House. 
“I've had my depression, I've had things I've been going through, and they’ll either call me or come to my room and knock on my door just to make sure I'm good,” he said. 
The Valor House is the third permanent housing complex for homeless veterans on the campus of the St. 
Michael's Veterans Center at 3838 Chelsea Drive in Kansas City. 
A ribbon-cutting ceremony on Tuesday marked the completion of both construction on Valor House and the nonprofit's 15-year master campus plan. 
The Valor House has 62 units, bringing the combined total of all complexes on campus to 179 units. 
It has been slowly admitting occupants since the beginning of the year, when the first units were ready and available. 
So far, around 60 people have moved into the units, some of which have two bedrooms for family members or buddy veterans. 
Susan Engel serves as St. 
Michael’s executive director. 
She said the dreams of the late Art Fillmore, a St. 
Michael’s board chairman, align with her goal to provide affordable housing to the veteran community. 
“Art believed our nation had a responsibility to ensure veterans were not forgotten after their service ended,” she said. 
She noted, as a former social worker, that when veterans are forced to live on the street, their humanity can be stripped away from them. 
She said society must play a role in establishing more permanent housing and recognizing homeless veterans as human beings, something St. 
Michael’s has been working on. 
“What we're trying to accomplish is to give people to be treated with dignity and to give them the space where they feel fully human again,” she said. 
The organization's data shows that 98% of St. 
Michael’s veterans remain in permanent housing, while 90% choose each year to continue to live specifically at the St. 
Michael's housing complex. 
St. 
Michael’s is now moving forward with the completion of Patriot Park, which will serve as a place of remembering those who served with the U.S. military, Engel said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.8%Brandon Azim: 1.8%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.5%Brandon Azim: 3.3%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic11.5%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Brandon Azim: 1.3%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias1.6%This article: 8.0%Brandon Azim: 2.4%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect8.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%Brandon Azim: 6.3%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 3.1%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Brandon Azim: 0.8%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Brandon Azim: 3.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%Brandon Azim: 2.8%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect10.1%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.1%Brandon Azim: 2.4%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority14.1%This article: 4.2%Brandon Azim: 0.8%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%False Dilemma4.2%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.4%Brandon Azim: 5.8%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization3.4%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.8%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.9%Brandon Azim: 3.6%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion16.9%This article: 5.6%Brandon Azim: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question5.6%This article: 5.0%Brandon Azim: 1.4%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 17.5%Brandon Azim: 4.1%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal17.5%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.3%Brandon Azim: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote9.3%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 1.7%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 4.2%Brandon Azim: 2.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination4.2%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Azim: 1.4%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

503 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers53%attributed speech238writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Curtis • 15 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Curtis • 24 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Curtis • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Curtis • 17 words • 100.0% coverageKevin Curtis • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageSusan Engel • 11 words • 0.0% coverageSusan Engel • 15 words • 0.0% coverageSusan Engel • 19 words • 0.0% coverageSusan Engel • 25 words • 0.0% coverageSusan Engel • 21 words • 100.0% coverageSusan Engel • 5 words • 0.0% coverageSusan Engel • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSusan Engel • 28 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kevin Curtis

87%flagged-word coverage
113 attributed words43% of attributed speech29% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote+2.4 ptsWriter: 12.6%Kevin Curtis: 15.0%15.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.