Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video44 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Pokalsky results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Loss Aversion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 37.125 hits. Analysis detected 202.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 44 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,304 of 25,885 speakers). This Ken Pokalsky is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Ken Pokalsky
Speaker details
Total words: 44
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.6% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos44 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos