Speaker summary
⁠66%4 analyzed articles/videos1,508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Griffin results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 3,902.496 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,508 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,885 of 28,364 speakers). This Ken Griffin is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
Ken Griffin
Speaker details
Total words: 1,508
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.7% percentile
4.2% BS Score4 analyzed videos1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 9.9%9.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 6.6%6.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos