Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video18.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kelsey Ables results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 113.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 18.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,791 of 28,364 speakers). This Kelsey Ables is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Kelsey Ables
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 18.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.6% percentile
70.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos18.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos