Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video706 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kellie Meiman Hock results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.3% saturation with 241.87 hits. Analysis detected 985.258 faulty-reasoning hits from 706 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (27,288 of 28,364 speakers). This Kellie Meiman Hock is better (less manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group.
Kellie Meiman Hock

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751003.8% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos706 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.1%9.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos