Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video73.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kelise Stewart results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Ad Hominem, and False Dilemma, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 46% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 193.701 faulty-reasoning hits from 73.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,250 of 28,364 speakers). This Kelise Stewart is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Kelise Stewart
Speaker details
Total words: 73.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.8% percentile
31.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos73.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 46.0%46.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 35.6%35.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 38.3%38.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 24.8%24.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.0%23.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 38.3%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 35.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos