Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video149.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keith J. Kirchubel results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 35.7% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 294 faulty-reasoning hits from 149.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,111 of 28,364 speakers). This Keith J. Kirchubel is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Keith J. Kirchubel
Speaker details
Total words: 149.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510046.7% percentile
29.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos149.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 35.7%35.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 39.3%39.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 35.7%35.7%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 39.3%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 35.7%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Speaker 35.7%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 2.7%Middle Ground: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos