Speaker summary
⁠81%2 analyzed articles/videos58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keir Simmons results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 44.1% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 127.565 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 2 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 27.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,829 of 28,364 speakers). This Keir Simmons is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Keir Simmons
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Content count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.2% percentile
27.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 44.1%44.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.6%31.6%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 44.1%44.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 44.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 44.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos