NBC News99%

U.S. military says 2 service members killed in Jordan by Iranian attacks 93%

7/18/2026, 5:13:59 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.3% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 1,655 faulty-reasoning hits from 559 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 87.7% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,655 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 92.40% of the video peer group.

After a week of escalating conflict, 
tonight two US service members are dead, 
killed defending against an Iranian 
missile and drone attack in Jordan. US 
Central Command says another service member is missing in action. 
The deaths, the first during direct Iranian fire since the early days of this war. 
This video showing the moments missiles hit Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan overnight. 
Though it is unclear if it's the same strike that killed those two service members. US Central Command says it's withholding their identities until 24 hours after their families have been notified. 
Four others were medically evacuated, but have since been discharged, CENTCOM says. 
Iran had claimed it destroyed at least two American fighter jets and three aircraft at a base in Jordan, with 
Iran's new supreme leader in a statement today vowing a forceful response to increasing American attacks. 
Iran has accused the US of killing civilians and striking bridges like this 
one close to a port on the Strait of Hormuz. And Iran says desalination plants have been hit that provide drinking water to thousands. CENTCOM 
says it's targeting Iran's military capability. 
And Iran has itself hit desalination plants in Kuwait. 
Here, large plumes of smoke are seen rising from an oil facility there. 
Kuwait has been hit hard. 
This satellite image showing the scope of the fire from the sky. 
Neighboring countries condemning those Iranian attacks as flagrant aggression. 
>> Keir Simmons joins me now from Jeddah in Saudi Arabia. 
And Keir, Jordan has been repeatedly targeted. 
>> That's right, Jose. 
Those US forces in Jordan have been have been under almost constant fire. 
Jordan has said in the past 2 days it has intercepted 13 missiles and four drones. 
Now, this new wave of strikes from CENTCOM, it says, will punish Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps for those deadly strikes on those US service members. 
Jose? 
>> Keir Simmons in Saudi Arabia, thank you. 
Let's go to Julie Shirkin, who's traveling with the president, joins us now from New Jersey. 
Julie, has the White House indicated how the president plans to respond to these deadly attacks from Iran? 
>> Jose, the US launching new strikes to punish Iran tonight, according to Central Command. 
The question remains, though, will the US will further escalate after the deaths of those two service members. 
service members. Lawmakers are sending condolences to their families. 
As for the White House, Jose, they are referring us back to that CENTCOM statement Keir referenced. We also haven't heard from President Trump, who has been unusually quiet on social media today. 
But remember, Jose, he told our Kristen Welker last month that he would take it very seriously if Iran killed more Americans. 
16 service members have now died in this conflict. 
And days ago, 
the president warned US forces would hit all of Iran's civilian infrastructure, from power plants to bridges. 
We've now seen eight straight nights of US strikes against Iran, Jose, and there's real concern back here at home about this war widening since peace talks collapsed. 
Jose? 
>> Julie Shirkin in Bridgewater, New Jersey, thank you. 
We thank you for watching, and remember, stay updated on breaking news and top stories on the NBC News app or watch live on our YouTube channel. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.0%NBC News: 2.1%Confirmation Bias10.0%This article: 9.1%NBC News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias9.1%This article: 8.4%NBC News: 2.9%Availability Heuristic8.4%This article: 4.8%NBC News: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic4.8%This article: 9.8%NBC News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias9.8%This article: 5.7%NBC News: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias5.7%This article: 20.0%NBC News: 6.4%Framing Effect20.0%This article: 4.5%NBC News: 0.2%Loss Aversion4.5%This article: 12.2%NBC News: 0.3%Status Quo Bias12.2%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 1.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%NBC News: 1.2%Pessimism Bias8.2%This article: 38.3%NBC News: 7.0%Negativity Bias38.3%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%NBC News: 1.5%In-Group Bias0.9%This article: 2.3%NBC News: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.3%This article: 2.1%NBC News: 4.0%Halo Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 15.4%NBC News: 1.3%Recency Bias15.4%This article: 4.8%NBC News: 0.5%Primacy Effect4.8%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 33.6%NBC News: 3.2%Appeal to Authority33.6%This article: 6.4%NBC News: 1.2%False Dilemma6.4%This article: 2.9%NBC News: 0.5%Slippery Slope2.9%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.6%NBC News: 3.2%Hasty Generalization3.6%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.3%NBC News: 0.7%Bandwagon2.3%This article: 24.2%NBC News: 4.9%Appeal to Emotion24.2%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 12.5%NBC News: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.5%This article: 1.6%NBC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque1.6%This article: 11.8%NBC News: 0.5%Burden of Proof11.8%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 12.9%NBC News: 1.5%Anecdotal12.9%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 22.7%NBC News: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)22.7%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%NBC News: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.8%

559 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers40%attributed speech333writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageCENTCOM • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageCENTCOM • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageKeir Simmons • 11 words • 0.0% coverageKeir Simmons • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJose • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJose • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJordan • 16 words • 0.0% coverageCENTCOM • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageKeir Simmons • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Shirkin • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWhite House • 18 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coveragePresident Trump • 33 words • 0.0% coverageKristen Welker • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Shirkin • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jose

100%flagged-word coverage
17 attributed words7.5% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.1 ptsWriter: 8.1%Jose: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.