Speaker summary
ā 93%1 analyzed article/video46 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie O'Connor results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 92 faulty-reasoning hits from 46 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ā 92% (2,303 of 28,364 speakers). This Katie O'Connor is worse (more manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group.
Katie O'Connor
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 92%Katie O'Connor (selected)100%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 46
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

92% percentile
025507510091.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos46 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos