Speaker summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video401 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Fire Thunder results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 794.783 faulty-reasoning hits from 401 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (23,074 of 28,364 speakers). This Katie Fire Thunder is better (less manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
Katie Fire Thunder
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠19%Katie Fire Thunder (selected)14%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 401
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510018.7% percentile
13.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos401 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 22.8%22.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.5%9.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos