Speaker summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video38 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katherine Hofmann results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 39.5% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 30 faulty-reasoning hits from 38 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,799 of 27,830 speakers). This Katherine Hofmann is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Katherine Hofmann
Speaker details
Total words: 38
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.6% percentile
39.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos38 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 39.5%39.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 39.5%39.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 39.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 39.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos