Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate's attorney results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Burden of Proof, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 79.1% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 102 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 59.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,145 of 28,364 speakers). This Kate's attorney is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
Kate's attorney
Speaker details
Total words: 43
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.8% percentile
59.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos43 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 79.1%79.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 41.9%41.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 58.1%58.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 79.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing Effect: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 26.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 41.9%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos