Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video57.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Wood results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 48.375 hits. Analysis detected 177.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 68.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (5,966 of 28,364 speakers). This Kate Wood is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Kate Wood
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 57.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
68.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos57.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos