Speaker summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos133.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Shaw results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Slippery Slope, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 415.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 133.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,222 of 27,648 speakers). This Kate Shaw is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Kate Shaw
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 133.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.9% percentile
28.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos133.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 42.0%42.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 24.5%24.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 42.0%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos