Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video47 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Martin results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Ad Hominem, and False Dilemma, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 93.7% saturation with 49.171 hits. Analysis detected 339.576 faulty-reasoning hits from 47 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 61.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,602 of 26,811 speakers). This Kate Martin is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Kate Martin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 47
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.4% percentile
61.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos47 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 93.7%93.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 93.7%93.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 91.7%91.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 69.8%69.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 69.8%69.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 47.8%47.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 47.8%47.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 47.8%47.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 47.8%47.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Halo Effect: Speaker 93.7%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 93.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 91.7%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 69.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 69.8%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 47.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 47.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 47.8%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 47.8%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos