Speaker summary
ā 93%1 analyzed article/video86.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Brick results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 73.125 hits. Analysis detected 460.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 86.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.3% and a BS Rank of ā 60% (11,582 of 28,364 speakers). This Kate Brick is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Kate Brick
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 60%Kate Brick (selected)42%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 86.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.2% percentile
41.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos86.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 72.3%72.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 54.2%54.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 54.2%54.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 36.1%36.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 38.9%38.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Politically Left Leaning ā€¦Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.8%13.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 72.3%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 54.2%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 54.2%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 38.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 7.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos