Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video78.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karena Hamlet results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 60.6% saturation with 53.625 hits. Analysis detected 230.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 78.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (18,121 of 38,547 speakers). This Karena Hamlet is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Karena Hamlet
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠53%Karena Hamlet (selected)34%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 78.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.0% percentile
33.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos78.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 60.6%60.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 42.4%42.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 21.2%21.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 21.2%21.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 28.8%28.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 60.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 42.4%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos