Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video53.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karen Sermon results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 330 faulty-reasoning hits from 53.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 64.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,512 of 28,364 speakers). This Karen Sermon is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Karen Sermon
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 53.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.0% percentile
64.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos53.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos