Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video46 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karen Quinn results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 70.6% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 46 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 52.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,919 of 28,364 speakers). This Karen Quinn is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Karen Quinn
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠73%Karen Quinn (selected)53%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 46
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.1% percentile
52.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos46 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 70.6%70.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 35.3%35.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 70.6%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 35.3%, sitewide 19.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos