Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video30.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kaplan Jørgensen results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 25.875 hits. Analysis detected 71.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 30.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,255 of 28,364 speakers). This Kaplan Jørgensen is worse (more manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group.
Kaplan Jørgensen
Speaker details
Total words: 30.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.4% percentile
58.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos30.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos