Speaker summary
⁠84%2 analyzed articles/videos434 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kandice Webber results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 41.8% saturation with 292 hits. Analysis detected 1,142.82 faulty-reasoning hits from 434 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (23,384 of 28,364 speakers). This Kandice Webber is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Kandice Webber
Speaker details
Total words: 434
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510017.6% percentile
12.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos434 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 41.8%41.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 24.1%24.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 18.2%18.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.8%11.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.1%13.1%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 41.8%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%No True Scotsman: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos