Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video34.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kamil Augustyn results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 117 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,440 of 28,265 speakers). This Kamil Augustyn is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
Kamil Augustyn
Speaker details
Total words: 34.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.8% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos34.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos