â 81%1 analyzed article/video121.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kadokawa results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Halo Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 35.2% saturation with 42.75 hits. Analysis detected 230 faulty-reasoning hits from 121.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.1% and a BS Rank of â 34% (18,708 of 28,364 speakers).This Kadokawa is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.