Indian brothers make manga debut in Japan 31%

By No Author44%

7/21/2026, 9:20:00 AM

Keywords: India, Manga

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Halo Effect, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 553 faulty-reasoning hits from 448 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.9% and a BS Rank of 31% (14,176 of 20,517 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the article peer group.

New Delhi  Two brothers in India have made their manga debut in Japan after being discovered by a major Japanese publisher searching for international talent. 
Jivan, 22, and Yash, 18, grew up in Amravati, a city of nearly a million residents in central India, and have worked under the name masterlynx. 
The pair won a prize in an international contest for manga without dialogue or text hosted by Kadokawa last year. 
In May this year, their manga “Kung Fu Kung Fool” began serialization on Kadokawa’s manga portal site. 
The action-comedy series follows the adventures of a notorious thief named Goemon and a young boy named Bao. 
“We are really happy  it feels like our dream come true,” the brothers said of their debut in an online interview. 
The brothers developed a passion for manga after becoming obsessed as children with the “Dragon Ball” anime series, adapted from the manga created by the late world-renowned manga artist Akira Toriyama. 
Inspired by Toriyama, Jivan and Yash taught themselves how to draw manga by repeatedly tracing and copying anime characters. 
However, Jivan said, “Actually, in India, there aren’t enough resources for us to learn.” 
Yash said that he supplemented his studies by watching YouTube videos created by other manga artists, including Naoki Urasawa, known for works such as “20th Century Boys.” 
Last year, while working on drawing illustrations for clients mainly in the United States and Europe, the brothers learned about Kadokawa’s manga contest. 
Because they had long wanted to make some fun stories and publish the work somewhere, even if it did not make any money, they entered the contest. 
Eventually, they won a silver prize and earned a monthly manga serialization. 
As one of the most challenging aspects of creating manga, the brothers cited Japanese onomatopoeia, words that imitate sounds or describe conditions. 
To address the challenge, a Kadokawa editorial team translates and adapts into Japanese the English expressions created by the brothers. 
“Our goal going forward is to just like make a lot of works,” Jivan said. 
Kadokawa said the brothers’ appeal lies in “their ambition as artists, pursuing their own unique styles while showing deep respect for Japanese manga.” 
The duo has “the potential to win fans around the world, not only in India and Japan,” the company said. 
The debut of the Indian brothers came at a time when securing promising manga creators has become increasingly difficult, due to higher demand for them as many businesses successively enter the manga market in recent years, Kadokawa said. 
This prompted the publisher to establish an overseas manga editorial section last year to support overseas creators and discover new talent. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.5%No Author: 3.2%The Japan Times: 3.6%Confirmation Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.6%The Japan Times: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%No Author: 3.9%The Japan Times: 4.7%Availability Heuristic10.9%This article: 5.8%No Author: 1.0%The Japan Times: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic5.8%This article: 2.7%No Author: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.6%Hindsight Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.6%The Japan Times: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%No Author: 11.2%The Japan Times: 14.4%Framing Effect4.5%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.4%The Japan Times: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.8%The Japan Times: 1.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.7%No Author: 4.7%The Japan Times: 4.7%Optimism Bias12.7%This article: 0.0%No Author: 2.4%The Japan Times: 3.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%No Author: 9.5%The Japan Times: 11.5%Negativity Bias3.1%This article: 6.0%No Author: 1.0%The Japan Times: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.7%The Japan Times: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.3%The Japan Times: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.1%The Japan Times: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.4%The Japan Times: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 12.1%No Author: 1.8%The Japan Times: 1.5%Halo Effect12.1%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.9%The Japan Times: 2.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%No Author: 0.7%The Japan Times: 0.9%Primacy Effect1.6%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.2%No Author: 4.9%The Japan Times: 5.6%Appeal to Authority11.2%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.0%The Japan Times: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.6%The Japan Times: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 3.1%The Japan Times: 4.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.3%The Japan Times: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.8%The Japan Times: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.9%No Author: 3.7%The Japan Times: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion4.9%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.7%The Japan Times: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 15.8%No Author: 3.4%The Japan Times: 4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.8%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.6%The Japan Times: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.6%The Japan Times: 1.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 2.3%The Japan Times: 3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.9%No Author: 5.3%The Japan Times: 4.5%Unattributed Quote4.9%This article: 4.9%No Author: 2.0%The Japan Times: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection4.9%This article: 1.6%No Author: 6.3%The Japan Times: 9.0%Biased Writer Voice1.6%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.4%The Japan Times: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.3%No Author: 0.4%The Japan Times: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…12.3%

448 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers31%attributed speech311writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJivan • 14 words • 0.0% coverageYash • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJivan • 15 words • 0.0% coverageKadokawa • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKadokawa • 20 words • 100.0% coverageKadokawa • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kadokawa

100%flagged-word coverage
81 attributed words59% of attributed speech65% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +13.4 ptsWriter: 11.3%Kadokawa: 24.7%24.7%Unattributed Quote-7.1 ptsWriter: 7.1%Kadokawa: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-7.1 ptsWriter: 7.1%Kadokawa: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%Kadokawa: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.