Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justine Bateman results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, False Dilemma, and Appeal to Emotion, with Straw Man as the most egregious example at 58.6% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 283 faulty-reasoning hits from 182 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,031 of 28,364 speakers). This Justine Bateman is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Justine Bateman
Speaker details
Total words: 182
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
22.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos182 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 58.6%58.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 30.6%30.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.3%15.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.3%15.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Straw Man: Speaker 58.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Straw ManSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos