Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video16 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justice Roberts results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 93.8% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 30 faulty-reasoning hits from 16 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 93.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,832 of 28,364 speakers). This Justice Roberts is worse (more manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
Justice Roberts
Speaker details
Total words: 16
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510083.0% percentile
93.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos16 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 93.8%93.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 93.8%93.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 93.8%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 93.8%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos