BS Summary: This video contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 1,038 faulty-reasoning hits from 767 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 82.2% and a BS Rank of 89% (2,424 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the video peer group.
All right, so all eyes are on the
Supreme Court today where rulings on
some of the term's biggest cases could
be released before the justice break for
summer recess.
This may include opinions
on the president's executive order
limiting birthright citizenship from
kids of illegal aliens and the issue of
biological men and female sports.
Fox News contributor and rage of the
republic author law professor uh
Jonathan Turley joins us right now.
Professor, it's good to see you in
person.
All right. So, you're the
professor. I'm just a student.
>> But, um,
>> when it comes to the birthright
citizenship, it doesn't look like it's
going to go the president's way, but
during the oral argument, it didn't seem
there was much conversation on the
original meaning of it, which it was for
the kids of slaves.
>> That's right. You could tell in Chief
Justice Roberts comments that the weight of history was heavy for him in terms of
precedent.
But what was often missed is that some of the people who wrote the
14th amendment said this does not apply to birthright citizenship and there's
very good arguments against it.
But we may have to look at the possibility of a
constitutional amendment if people want
to go the way of most countries
including most of our allies in
rejecting what I think is a really
ill-considered policy.
>> Right. Let's go to um the other decision
and this is the president when it con
he's considering what the Supreme Court
is going to consider uh men plan and
biological males plan in in sports. What
do you think the court is going to make
of this one?
>> Well, the tea leaves here seem to favor
the states. That is the justices seemed
ready to say that states could in fact
limit athletes to their biological sex.
And that's how we're sort of expecting
this to go. things can change in the
drafting, but on that one, I think you
bet for the states.
>> Um, I'm curious, what is your message on
this 250 considering the court and how
it is and people wanting to pack the
court, get away from our founding
documents.
What's your advice?
>> You know, we're really seeing not a
crisis of the constitution, but a crisis
of faith today.
Many Democratic leaders
saying they're going to pack the court.
Uh, you've got deans and law professors saying they're going to trash the Constitution.
This is something that we have to deal with as Americans.
As I talk about rage in the republic, we were the fascination
of the world.
We were the first true enlightenment revolution based on the concept that our rights come from God,
not from the government.
>> We have to answer the question a
Frenchman asked at that time and asked
what then is this American? They were
intrigued by these people that had
nothing in common that came together at
this point in the globe and created the world's first major enlightenment
revolution.
The question is, can we answer that today of who we were and who
we are today?
>> I think we can, but maybe this 250 will
allow us to rediscover who we are.
These are revolutionary times, but we're still
a revolutionary people. Mhm. Everybody's
not going to go to law school and that
is okay.
We don't need more lawyers.
But how can we educate the next generation
about just the basics of our founding?
Because I think it starts there, right?
>> You really put your finger on it. We've actually really lost civics's education.
In higher education, you have an echo chamber that is extremely anti-American,
extremely anti-constitution.
Uh you've got all these law professors want to amend the first amendment and
get rid of the constitution. That echo
chamber is really harmful and it's
producing young people that have no
notion of who they are, who we are at
this moment.
We still represent the
greatest hope for this world.
We represent something different and we
represent a nation that believes that
our rights belong to us to be fully
human given to us by God.
That is still a a novel and important,
you know, principle that's worth fighting for.
>> It is. And we got to defend it to the
very end.
Professor,
>> my friend,
>> good to see you.
Be sure to like and subscribe for all the Fox News latest on
YouTube and catch full shows streaming
now on Fox
Speakers
4speakers5.0%attributed speech729writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
94%flagged-word coverageJustice Roberts
16 attributed words42% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.