Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justice Raper results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Primacy Effect, and Actor-Observer Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 47.2% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 218 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,732 of 28,364 speakers). This Justice Raper is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Justice Raper
Speaker details
Total words: 108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510041.0% percentile
25.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos108 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 47.2%47.2%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 21.3%21.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 21.3%21.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.3%21.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 47.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 11.1%Primacy Effect: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 0.6%Ad Hominem: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos