Speaker summary
⁠54%2 analyzed articles/videos66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justice Dept. results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 51.7% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 240 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 46% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (10,705 of 28,364 speakers). This Justice Dept. is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Justice Dept.
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510062.3% percentile
46.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos66 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 51.7%51.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 51.7%51.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 51.7%51.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 51.7%51.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 34.5%34.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 34.5%34.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 51.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 51.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 51.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 51.7%, sitewide 8.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos