Speaker summary
⁠69%3 analyzed articles/videos42 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justice Department officials results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, False Dilemma, and Negativity Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 72% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 175.68 faulty-reasoning hits from 42 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 51.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,079 of 28,364 speakers). This Justice Department officials is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Justice Department officials
Speaker details
Total words: 42
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.5% percentile
51.6% BS Score3 analyzed videos42 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 72.0%72.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 66.0%66.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 40.0%40.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 72.0%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 66.0%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos