Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video149.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Juliette Kayyem results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Pessimism Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 46.9% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 471.806 faulty-reasoning hits from 149.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (21,748 of 28,364 speakers). This Juliette Kayyem is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Juliette Kayyem
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠24%Juliette Kayyem (selected)16%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 149.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510023.3% percentile
15.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos149.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 46.9%46.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.5%29.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 17.1%17.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.4%19.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 46.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos