Speaker summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video138.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julieta Rosell results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 35.6% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 338 faulty-reasoning hits from 138.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,302 of 28,364 speakers). This Julieta Rosell is better (less manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Julieta Rosell
Speaker details
Total words: 138.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510032.0% percentile
20.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos138.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 35.6%35.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos