Speaker summary
⁠28%3 analyzed articles/videos2,521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Szymczak results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 1,589.325 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,521 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,328 of 28,364 speakers). This Julia Szymczak is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group.
Julia Szymczak
Speaker details
Total words: 2,521
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Composition/Division: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%No True Scotsman: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Straw Man: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos