Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video458.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judith Ellen Brunton results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Hasty Generalization, and Slippery Slope, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 1,396.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 458.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (22,758 of 25,521 speakers). This Judith Ellen Brunton is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Judith Ellen Brunton
Speaker details
Total words: 458.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510010.8% percentile
9.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos458.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 22.7%22.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Straw Man: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 0.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Composition/Division: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos