Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video112 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JP Morrell results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Self-Serving Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 53.8% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 325.297 faulty-reasoning hits from 112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (17,902 of 28,364 speakers). This JP Morrell is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
JP Morrell
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 112
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.9% percentile
22.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos112 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 53.8%53.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 39.8%39.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 9.7%9.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 53.8%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 39.8%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos