Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joshua Linder results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 105.75 hits. Analysis detected 336.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 141 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,648 of 28,364 speakers). This Joshua Linder is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
Joshua Linder
Speaker details
Total words: 141
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.0% percentile
55.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos141 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 45.7%45.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 45.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos