Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video85.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joshua Goodman results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Bandwagon as the most egregious example at 73.4% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 454.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 85.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 48% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (9,911 of 26,780 speakers). This Joshua Goodman is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Joshua Goodman
Speaker details
Total words: 85.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
48.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos85.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 73.4%73.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 86.7%86.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 73.4%73.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 55.1%55.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 36.7%36.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 36.7%36.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.7%36.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 13.3%13.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 86.7%, sitewide 15.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 73.4%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 73.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 55.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos