Speaker summary
⁠45%2 analyzed articles/videos25.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Hokit results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Bandwagon, and Unattributed Quote, with Out-Group Homogeneity Bias as the most egregious example at 55.7% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 65 faulty-reasoning hits from 25.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (16,151 of 28,364 speakers). This Josh Hokit is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Josh Hokit
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠44%Josh Hokit (selected)27%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 25.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.1% percentile
26.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos25.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 55.7%55.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 24.6%24.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 55.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos