Speaker summary
58% 3 analyzed articles/videos 329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Elliott results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , False Dilemma , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 81.282 hits . Analysis detected 667.586 faulty-reasoning hits from 329 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,680 of 28,364 speakers). This Josh Elliott is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group. Josh Elliott
Speaker details
Total words: 329
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.9% percentile 7.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos329 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 16.1% 16.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 19.4% 19.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst