Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video280 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Brill results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Begging the Question, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 107.286 hits. Analysis detected 228.286 faulty-reasoning hits from 280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (36,398 of 42,498 speakers). This Josh Brill is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
Josh Brill
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠15%Josh Brill (selected)11%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 280
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510014.4% percentile
10.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos280 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 31.1%31.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos