Speaker summary
ā 62%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Seymour results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 120 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70% and a BS Rank of ā 80% (5,854 of 28,364 speakers). This Joseph Seymour is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Joseph Seymour
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 80%Joseph Seymour (selected)70%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.4% percentile
70.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos