Speaker summary
ā 57%1 analyzed article/video306.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Llobrera results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 799.779 faulty-reasoning hits from 306.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.7% and a BS Rank of ā 18% (23,446 of 28,364 speakers). This Joseph Llobrera is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Joseph Llobrera
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 18%Joseph Llobrera (selected)13%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 306.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510017.3% percentile
12.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos306.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.2%15.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos