Speaker summary
50% 1 analyzed article/video 1,693.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jorge R. Gutierrez results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 511 hits . Analysis detected 2,202.736 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,693.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,393 of 26,730 speakers). This Jorge R. Gutierrez is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group. Jorge R. Gutierrez
Speaker details
Total words: 1,693.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.3% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 15.5% 15.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 20.1% 20.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst