Speaker summary
50%1 analyzed article/video1,693.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jorge R. Gutierrez results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 511 hits. Analysis detected 2,202.736 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,693.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,393 of 26,730 speakers). This Jorge R. Gutierrez is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group.
Jorge R. Gutierrez
Speaker details
Total words: 1,693.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751001.3% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.1%20.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos