Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video79 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jorge Chipi Vera results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 174 faulty-reasoning hits from 79 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,775 of 28,364 speakers). This Jorge Chipi Vera is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Jorge Chipi Vera
Speaker details
Total words: 79
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.9% percentile
25.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos79 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 37.4%37.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 37.4%37.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.2%20.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 20.2%20.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 37.4%, sitewide 0.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 37.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos