â 53%1 analyzed article/video107.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jordan Braxton results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and False Dilemma, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 92.4% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 376.15 faulty-reasoning hits from 107.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.5% and a BS Rank of â 52% (13,614 of 28,364 speakers).This Jordan Braxton is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.