Speaker summary
ā 62%1 analyzed article/video12 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Freedland results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 6 hits. Analysis detected 6 faulty-reasoning hits from 12 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ā 68% (9,143 of 28,364 speakers). This Jonathan Freedland is worse (more manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Jonathan Freedland
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 68%Jonathan Freedland (selected)50%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 12
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

68% percentile
025507510067.8% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos12 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos