Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video278 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan De Barros results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 51.3% saturation with 142.74 hits. Analysis detected 822.559 faulty-reasoning hits from 278 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (22,851 of 28,364 speakers). This Jonathan De Barros is better (less manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
Jonathan De Barros
Speaker details
Total words: 278
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.4% percentile
13.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos278 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 51.4%51.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 44.9%44.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 11.2%11.2%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 51.4%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 44.9%, sitewide 26.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%No True Scotsman: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos